Method and Proposed Approach to Constructing the Index of Basic Education Quality

Zhang Jiahui; Li Feng; Xin Tao

doi:10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.04.003

Volume 39 Issue 4

Apr. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences) > 2021 > 39(4): 30-41

Zhang Jiahui, Li Feng, Xin Tao. Method and Proposed Approach to Constructing the Index of Basic Education Quality[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(4): 30-41. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.04.003

Citation:

Zhang Jiahui, Li Feng, Xin Tao. Method and Proposed Approach to Constructing the Index of Basic Education Quality[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2021, 39(4): 30-41. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.04.003

Citation:

PDF( 811 KB)

Method and Proposed Approach to Constructing the Index of Basic Education Quality

doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.04.003

1.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2.
School of Statistics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China

Publish Date: 2021-04-21

Abstract

Abstract

The development of basic education quality index can provide scientific and effective evaluation for education quality. This paper first reviewed the related explorations on educational indicator systems and educational indices to provide insight into the construction of the basic education quality index of China. Based on the goal of improving education quality and the specific requirements for the construction of the basic education quality index proposed by the trend of educational evaluation system reform in this new age, this paper proposed a possible approach to constructing the educational indicator system based on the CIPP framework, selecting input, process and product indicators according to validity evidence, building a comprehensive evaluation system allowing the participation of multiple sides, using and interpreting the index based on the quality standards, and considering equity and quality simultaneously. Meanwhile, to facilitate the construction of the basic education quality index, there is a need for a series of educational empirical studies in the areas such as data linking and imputation, the local validation of quality indicators, validation of indices of different levels, the index construction at the age of “Internet +”, comparison of different aggregation methods, case study of index application with quality standards, and the construction of index merging quality level and equality.
- quality of basic education,
- index,
- indicator system,
- quality standard

FullText(HTML)

References(46)

References

[1]	程凤春, 卫喆. (2012). 再论教育质量及其衡量标准—基于ISO9000族标准的分析. 教育研究,6,56—60.
[2]	俄罗斯联邦教育部. (2017). 2016年普通教育机构质量评估体系指标. 取自: http://demo.kopeysk-uo.ru/upravlenie-obrazovaniya/napravleniya/107-kontrol-i-nadzor/sistema-otsenki-kachestva-obrazovaniya/munitsipalnaya-model-otsenki-kachestva-obrazovaniya/224-pokazateli-sistemy-otsenki-kachestva-obshcheobrazovatelnykh-uchrezhdenij-2016.html
[3]	郭金玉, 张忠彬, 孙庆云. (2008). 层次分析法的研究与应用. 中国安全科学学报,5,148—153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2008.03.027
[4]	黄芳. (2018). 普及化高等教育阶段的质量观—基于美国、英国和日本的经验及启示. 现代教育论丛,224(6),37—42.
[5]	李晓西, 刘一萌, 宋涛. (2014). 人类绿色发展指数的测算. 中国社会科学,222(6),69—95, 207−208.
[6]	刘志军, 徐彬. (2019). 教育评价: 应然性与实然性的博弈及超越. 教育研究,40(5),10—17.
[7]	吕晶. (2020). 中国教育实证研究中的定量方法: 五年应用述评. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),38(9),36—55.
[8]	戚兴华. (2019). 绩效与公平:美国博士生教育质量评价的价值取向探析. 上海教育评估研究,8(4),29—34.
[9]	苏为华. (2000). 多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究. 厦门: 厦门大学博士论文.
[10]	王健健等. (2005). 统计学基础. 武汉: 武汉理工大学出版社.
[11]	王志平. (2007). “人类发展指数” (HDI): 含义、方法及改进. 上海行政学院学报,37(3),47—57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3176.2007.03.005
[12]	辛涛, 姜宇. (2012). 在国际视域下定义教育质量标准. 人民教育,12,2—6.
[13]	徐蔼婷. (2006). 德尔菲法的应用及其难点. 中国统计,9,57—59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4557.2006.01.035
[14]	徐国祥. (2004). 统计指数理论及应用. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
[15]	杨永恒, 胡鞍钢, 张宁. (2005). 基于主成分分析法的人类发展指数替代技术. 经济研究,7,4—17.
[16]	张民选, 陆璟, 占胜利, 朱小虎, 王婷婷. (2011). 专业视野中的PISA. 教育研究,6,5—12.
[17]	张炜, 周洪宇. (2019). 中国教育指数(2019年版). 宁波大学学报(教育科学版),41(3),1—8.
[18]	张小波. (2013). 基于综合评价的研究生教育质量效率指数研究—对“985工程”一期34所高校的实证分析. 中国高教研究,9,68—75.
[19]	周光礼, 袁晓萍. (2020). 聚焦“四个评价” 深化教育评价机制改革. 中国考试,340(8),1—5.
[20]	庄艳. (2009). 统计指数相关问题的思考. 技术与市场,16(5),38—38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8554.2009.05.026
[21]	Altinok, N., Angrist, N., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Global Data Set on Education Quality (1965—2015) Policy Research Working Paper Series 8314. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29281.
[22]	Altinok, N., Diebolt, C., & Meulemeester, J.-L. D. (2014). A new international database on education quality: 1965—2010. Applied Economics, 46(11), 1212—1247. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2013.868592
[23]	Angrist, N., Patrinos, H.A., & Schlotter, M. (2013). An Expansion of a Global Data Set on Educational Quality (No. WPS6536). The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
[24]	Atkinson, A.B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244—263. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6
[25]	Buchmann, G., & Neri, M. C. The Brazilian Education Quality Index (Ideb): Measurement and Incentives Up-grades. Rio de Janeiro : FGV, EPGE, 2010 (Ensaios Econômicos; 686).
[26]	Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). Validity of Educational Indicators. International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition), 193—199.
[27]	Council of Ministers of Education. (2007). Council Conclusions of 25 May 2007 on a Coherent Framework of Indicators and Benchmarks for Monitoring Progress towards the Lisbon Objectives in Education and Training. Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news-and-press/news/council-conclusions-coherent-framework-indicators-and-benchmarks-monitoring.
[28]	European Commission. (2019). Education and Training Monitor 2019. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/15d70dc3-e00e-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-171178208.
[29]	Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2007). The role of education quality for economic growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4122. Retrieved from https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.1596/1813-9450-4122.
[30]	Haven, H. (1999). Education in Finland. Statistics and Indicators. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
[31]	Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., & Xin, T. (2019). Toward education quality improvement in china: a brief overview of the national assessment of education quality. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 44(6), 733—751. doi: 10.3102/1076998618809677
[32]	Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In Brennan R. L. (eds.). Educational measurement (4th edition). Washington, DC: American Council on Education/Praeger.
[33]	National Education Association. (2010). Teacher assessment and evaluation: The National Education Association’s framework for transforming education systems to support effective teaching and improve student learning. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/TeachrAssmntWhtPaperTransform10_2.pdf.
[34]	National Research Council (NRC). (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[35]	NRC. (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? Committee on the Evaluation Framework for Successful K-12 STEM Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[36]	Nuttall, D. L. (1994). Choosing indicators. In Riley, K. A. & Nuttall, D. L. (ed.). Measuring Quality: Education Indicators – United Kingdom and International Perspectives. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
[37]	Oakes, J. (1989). What educational indicators? The case for assessing the school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 181—199. doi: 10.3102/01623737011002181
[38]	OECD (2020). How’s Life? 2020: Measuring Well-being. Paris, OECD Publishing.
[39]	Poliandri, D., Cardone, M., Muzzioli, P., & Romiti, S, (2010). Dynamic Database for Quality Indicators Comparison in Education. Istituto Nazionale per la Valutazione del Sistema Educativo di Istruzione e di Formazione Working Paper No. 04/2010. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1639398 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1639398
[40]	Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., & Oakes, J. (1989). Indicators for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education: A Sourcebook. (Report No. R-3742-NSF/RC). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
[41]	Stensaker, B. (2007). Quality as a fashion: Exploring the translation of a management idea into higher education. In Westerheijden, D. F., Stensaker, B. & Rosa, M. J. (eds.). Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation. Dordrecht: Springer.
[42]	Tovey, P. (1994). Quality assurance in continuing professional education. New York: Routledge Illustration.
[43]	United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1990). Human Development Report 1990. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[44]	United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1994). Human Development Report 1994. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[45]	United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1995). Human Development Report 1995. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[46]	United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2019). Human Development Report 2019. New York: United Nations Development Programme.