中国人文社会科学核心期刊

中文社会科学引文索引(CSSCI)来源期刊

中文核心期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 29 Issue 4
Mar.  2012
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Chen Yalin, Liu Chang. The Intuition in Number Processing[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2011, 29(4): 57-63.
Citation: Chen Yalin, Liu Chang. The Intuition in Number Processing[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2011, 29(4): 57-63.

The Intuition in Number Processing

  • Publish Date: 2011-12-20
  • loading
  • [1]
    Barrett, L.F., Tugade, M.M., & Engle, R.W.(2004). Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 553-573. doi:  10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
    [2]
    Evans, J.S.B.T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454-459. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
    [3]
    Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C.K., Mozzocco, K. & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 406-413.
    [4]
    Reyna, V.F. & Brainerd, C.J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 89-107. doi:  10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
    [5]
    von Sydow, M. (2011). The Bayesian logic of frequency-based conjunction fallacies. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(2), 119-139. doi:  10.1016/j.jmp.2010.12.001
    [6]
    [7]
    Campbell, J.I.D., Parker, H.R., & Doetzel, N.L. (2004). Interactive Effects of Numerical Surface Form and Operand Parity in Cognitive Arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 51-64. doi:  10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.51
    [8]
    胡林成、熊哲宏: 《数能力的模块性—Dehaene的"神经元复用"理论述评》, 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2008年第1期. http://kns.cnki.net/kns/detail/detail.aspx?QueryID=8&CurRec=1&recid=&FileName=HDXK200801012&DbName=CJFD2008&DbCode=CJFQ&yx=&pr=&URLID=
    [9]
    Yagoubi, R.E., Lemaire, P., & Besson, M. (2003). Different brain mechanisms mediate two strategies in arithmetic: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 41(7), 855-862. doi:  10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00180-X
    [10]
    Núñez-Peña, M.I., Cortiñas, M., & Escera, C. (2006). Problem size effect and processing strategies in mental arithmetic. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 17(4), 357-360.
    [11]
    [12]
    DeStefano, D. & LeFevre, J.-A. (2004). The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 353-386. doi:  10.1080/09541440244000328
    [13]
    Jost, K., Hennighausen, E. & Röser, F. (2004). Comparing arithmetic and semantic fact retrieval: Effects of problem size and sentence constraint on event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 41(1), 46-59. doi:  10.1111/psyp.2004.41.issue-1
    [14]
    Windschitl, P.D. (2002). Judging the accuracy of a likelihood judgement: The case of smoking risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 19-35. doi:  10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0771
    [15]
    Yi, R. & Bickel, W.K. (2005). Representation of odds in terms of frequencies reduces probability discounting. The Psychological Record, 55(4), 577-593. doi:  10.1007/BF03395528
    [16]
    Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D.G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 271-296. doi:  10.1023/A:1005595519944
    [17]
    Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal., 24, 1-12. doi:  10.1111/risk.2004.24.issue-1
    [18]
    Pacini, R. & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic believes, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972-987. doi:  10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
    [19]
    Reyna, V.F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk. A dual-processes approach. Curr Dir Psychol Sci., 13(2), 60-6. doi:  10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
    [20]
    Kahneman, D. (2003). A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist, 58(September), 697-720. doi:  10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
    [21]
    Reyna, V.F. & Lloyd, F.J. (2006). Physician decision-making and cardiac risk: Effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 12, 179-195. doi:  10.1037/1076-898X.12.3.179
    [22]
    Lemer, C., Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., & Cohen, L. (2003). Approximate quantities and exact number words: Dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia, 41(14), 1942-1958. doi:  10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00123-4
    [23]
    Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284(5416), 970-974.
    [24]
    Kalaman, D.A. & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Working memory demands of exact and approximate addition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 187-212. doi:  10.1080/09541440600713445
    [25]
    Klein, E., Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G., Knops, A., & Willmes, K. (2009). The exact vs. approximate distinction in numerical cognition may not be exact, but only approximate: How different processes work together in multi-digit addition. Brain and Cognition, 69(2), 369-381. doi:  10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.031
    [26]
    Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(3-6), 487-506. doi:  10.1080/02643290244000239
    [27]
    LeFevre, J.-A., Sadesky, G.S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 216-230.
    [28]
    Kong, J., Wang, C., Kwong, K., Vangel, M., Chua, E., & Gollub, R. (2005). The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 397-405. doi:  10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.011
    [29]
    Kazui, H., Kitagaki, H., & Mori, E. (2000). Cortical activation during retrieval of arithmetical facts and actual calculation: A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 54(4), 479-485. doi:  10.1046/j.1440-1819.2000.00739.x
    [30]
    Vandorpe, S., De Rammelaere, S., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). The Odd-Even Effect in Addition: An Analysis per Problem Type. Experimental Psychology, 52(1), 47-54. doi:  10.1027/1618-3169.52.1.47
    [31]
    Núñez-Peña, M.I. & Escera, C. (2007). An event-related brain potential study of the arithmetic split effect. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64(2), 165-173. doi:  10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.01.007
    [32]
    Krueger, L.E. & Hallford, E.W. (1984). Why 2+2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verification. Memory & Cognition, 12(2), 171-180.
    [33]
    Lochy, A., Seron, X., Delazer, M., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The odd-even effect in multiplication: Parity rule or familiarity with even numbers? Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 358-365.
    [34]
    陈亚林、刘昌、张小将、徐晓东、沈汪兵: 《心算活动中混合策略选择的ERP研究》, 《心理学报》2011年第4期. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFD2011&filename=XLXB201104005&v=MTMzODNUYkxHNEg5RE1xNDlGWVlSOGVYMUx1eFlTN0RoMVQzcVRyV00xRnJDVVJMMmVaZWRtRnlEa1Vyck1QU0g=
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (148) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return